Device converter



Classified ads

Put an ad on this website

Recently added

articles > Economy/Politics events

Lemaire v Savarit

Results First Round French Parliamentary Elections - Northern Europe

By FranceInLondon

Two women will be facing each other in the second round of the elections to become the first MP to represent the French living in Northern Europe at the French parliament. Just under 90,000 people were registered to vote and only 20.8% exercised their right. Interestingly enough, for the first time voters had been able to vote online and 16.2%  opted for this option. The abstention level was particularly bad in London where only 18.4% used their vote. This was probably made worse by the long Jubilee weekend, the children’s half term and the appalling transport conditions on Sunday when the Jubilee pageant was taking place on the Thames. Could it also simply be that the election had not achieved the interest level that one would have hoped given that this was the first time ever that the French living abroad were being given a chance to elect someone to represent them at the French Parliament.

Many candidates complained of the difficulty in targetting their electorat given the size of the territory and the lack of media coverage.


The results

Axelle Lemaire (Socialist Party) came first with 30.2% of the votes. Emmanuelle Savarit (UMP) was some way behind with only 21.6% of the votes. As for Olivier Cadic (Alliance Centriste) and Olivier Bertin (Europe Ecologie/Les Verts) who both already represent the French at the ‘Assemblée des Francais de l’Etranger’ they were 3rd and fourth with 11.3% and 10.3% respectively. Yannick Naud (Modem) achieved 6.2% and Gaspard Koenig (Parti Liberal) 4.4%.

It is worth noting that out of the 20 candidates running in these elections, only 5 of them managed to get the minimum 5% of the votes to have their campaign costs reimbursed.



Many were surprised to see that Emmanuelle Savarit had managed to reach the second round as she had avoided all along her campaign any of the debates organised by various groups when all the other main candidates were taking part.

She had been heard saying that she was waiting for the second round of the elections. This could lead us to believe that people were voting for a party rather than for the person running.

Let's hope that the Français de l'étranger will turn up in greater numbers to elect their MP and make their voice heard on 17th June.


28/06/2012 - emilietapping said :

the low turnout is actually probably because of the Java mix-up. Most people were expecting to be able to register online and vote rather than travel to vote and so probably didn't organise an alternative. The online voting system was horrendous. I would consider myself to be generally quite computer literate but asking us to download a version of Java (the process of finding out that this was the problem when your log-in returned some garbled message was also particularly lengthy), only then to find out that the latest version was too new! then having to mess around with the settings to uninstall the newest version, go back and try and attempt to install a later version was just ridiculous. Most voters I know were completely unable to vote online. I think your statement in the email version of this article which said that only 18/4% of London voters 'bothered' to vote was probably a bit dismissive of these issues.

14/06/2012 - patriciaconnell said :

I think you should read the article which appeared in Le Monde this weekend.
It is very informative about Emmanuelle Savarit's views on Debates and the fact she thinks they do not win votes.
As for the debates mentioned in our articles, you will find that the ones that were held at King's College before the first round of elections were all attended by the main candidates but not by Emmanuelle Savarit. There is nothing defamatory about what is written in this article. These are simple facts.

13/06/2012 - pgray said :

Contrary to your article, my undertsanding is that debates were arranged but the Lemaire cancelled on a number of occasions so your article is factually incorrect as well as being potentially defamatory. Was Savarit asked to comment on the article before it was published - I doubt it? If you are, as it seems, a mouthpiece of the socialist party rather than a serious political commentator you should at least make that clear on your web site.


Comments are moderated. They are displayed after an administrator validation.


You can reload the captcha by clicking on it